AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?
Source:
guardianTech
August 12, 2026 · 08:00
After Australia’s first reported automated hacking accident, experts warn deployers – and possibly developers – of AI agents could be held liable for the actions of their botsFollow our Australia news live blog for latest updatesGet our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcastThe law is clear, says Prof Jeannie Paterson. “If I deploy an AI agent and it causes harm to someone else, I am responsible for that harm.“Even if I didn’t intend for that to happen, it was foreseeable, and I should be taking responsibility.” Continue reading...
The original article opens on the publisher's website.
More from Automotive
View topic →Larry Page’s flying car company Pivotal loses its CEO
techcrunch
Sep 1, 2026 · 16:59
SEC proposes transfer agent rule, sets event to figure out round-the-clock U.S. trading
coinDesk
Sep 1, 2026 · 16:55
The Range Rover Electric: Specs, Price, Availability
wired
Sep 1, 2026 · 16:01
North Carolina Rep. Chuck Edwards is formally censured over harassment allegations
nprNews
Sep 1, 2026 · 15:18
AfterQuery reportedly becomes Y Combinator’s fastest-ever unicorn, now valued at $3.2B
techcrunch
Sep 1, 2026 · 15:08
Countries mentioned