Domicile Isn't a Real Argument For Citizenship Says Wydra
Source:
bloombergMarkets
June 30, 2026 · 12:06
A divided US Supreme Court upheld the constitutional right of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s planned restrictions and invalidating a central plank of his immigration agenda. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. "National citizenship was not an independent concept but simply derivative of state citizenship. “Every citizen of a state,” it was often said, was “ipso facto a citizen of the United States.” In these contexts, too, national citizenship required domicile because state citizenship required domicile." Justice Thomas wrote. Elizabeth Wydra, President of the Constitutional Accountability Center joined Balance of Power to discuss. (Source: Bloomberg)
The original article opens on the publisher's website.
More from Energy
View topic →US defends Venezuela deal as Chevron prepares to expand operations
financialTimes
Sep 1, 2026 · 13:48
What to Know About Venezuelan Energy Following Trump’s Oil Deal
nytimes
Sep 1, 2026 · 10:18
Two More Oil Tankers Are Attacked in the Strait of Hormuz
nytimes
Sep 1, 2026 · 09:16
AI data center firm SB Energy, which is backed by Softbank, Nvidia and OpenAI, files for IPO
cnbc
Sep 1, 2026 · 08:43
Your files stay put: Perplexity’s hybrid AI keeps confidential data off the cloud
ventureBeat
Sep 1, 2026 · 08:00
Countries mentioned